Weapons "out of place"

General WWII and Reenactment Topics Only. Post anything else in Off Topic, please.
User avatar
reddevil1311
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: A foxhole somewhere in East London
Contact:

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by reddevil1311 »

My great uncle was an LT in the Recconaissance, 59th Staffs. He "exchanged" his sten for an MP40 and used that well into Germany.

Great thread!

Ashley
"I am a white male aged 18 to 45, everyone listens to me no matter how dumb my suggestions are"

www.reenactor.se (FHF - Sweden)
http://combatengineers.forumup.org/
User avatar
Schuller
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by Schuller »

Volkssturm recruits, looks like steyr mannlicher m95
Image
Image
Image

Another mannlicher or a WWI mauser?
Image
Gunther Schuller, Schutze, 136, 1./G.R.914, 352 ID
User avatar
LuftwaffeFD
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:03 pm

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by LuftwaffeFD »

I believe alot of captured SMLE's from Dunkirk were reissued through the Volkssturm.

Danny
"Chorlitz|12.SS|": With that many mp40s i dont think anyone had a chance.
"Gott Mit Uns": Your right - they were all picked off 300 meters away by riflemen.
BERG
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by BERG »

Look at this one, one of Mussolini's bodyguards -armed with a ppsh! Winter 1944/45.

Image
User avatar
Schuller
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by Schuller »

I guess Italian partisans could have received small ammounts of PPSH's, perhaps those weapons were supplied by yugoslavian partisans who had received them from the soviets by airdrop
Or even brought by German soldiers who fought partisans in the Balkans
And the last theory: from kossack units deployed in Italy by that time
Gunther Schuller, Schutze, 136, 1./G.R.914, 352 ID
BERG
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by BERG »

Sten guns in Italian use, probably aquired from allied misdrops;

Image

Image

Image
gurowski
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:35 pm
Location: NZ

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by gurowski »

Schuller wrote: Or even brought by German soldiers who fought partisans in the Balkans
I think you might find this is the probable answer. The PPSH41 was an issue weapon for the German forces after op Barbarossa. The capture of large stocks of them provided enough of them to make them the second most common SMG in the German army after the MP40. And after they ran out of 7.62 tokarev ammo they converted them to 9mm and fired MP40 mags via an adapter.
User avatar
Schuller
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by Schuller »

I think you might find this is the probable answer. The PPSH41 was an issue weapon for the German forces after op Barbarossa. The capture of large stocks of them provided enough of them to make them the second most common SMG in the German army after the MP40. And after they ran out of 7.62 tokarev ammo they converted them to 9mm and fired MP40 mags via an adapter.
It certainly makes more sense that way, although much more common for the eastern front
___________________________
This one is from Italy too, a Bren used by a fallschirmjäger 8)

Image
Gunther Schuller, Schutze, 136, 1./G.R.914, 352 ID
pepperpot
Posts: 916
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:20 am
Location: surrey

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by pepperpot »

The germans did copy the sten, called the mp3008 with the mag at the bottom as per mp40, however it had the same realibility as the sten and i was told ended up being issued to the volkst. and the feldgendarmerie in Berlin, not sure how accurate the FD info is. i have a b.f. mp3008. there also was another problem that the mp3008 was designed to take sten mags and not the mp40 mags. again cant see the logic in that however it was war time!!!
graham
gurowski
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:35 pm
Location: NZ

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by gurowski »

pepperpot wrote:there also was another problem that the mp3008 was designed to take sten mags and not the mp40 mags. again cant see the logic in that however it was war time!!!
graham
No, it was the other way round Graham, they were designed to use MP40 mags.
User avatar
Schuller
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by Schuller »

The magazines were not compatible? I thought they were since both mp40 and sten use the same ammo
Gunther Schuller, Schutze, 136, 1./G.R.914, 352 ID
User avatar
barnaclebill
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:05 pm

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by barnaclebill »

Same ammo, different mags.
Matt, 85th Gebirgsjager, part of the '39-45 Society'.
User avatar
Schuller
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by Schuller »

I see, it's like pps43 and ppsh41
Gunther Schuller, Schutze, 136, 1./G.R.914, 352 ID
User avatar
der Blutiger Eimer
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:55 am
Location: Maine, USA

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by der Blutiger Eimer »

regarding comments about converting Ppsh's to German 9mm after the soviet ammo ran out,
how practical would that have been to do in the field (well, at least by the most forward armorer available)?
i'm not terribly familiar with what it would take, the precise differences in cartridges, nor am i a gunshith, but while i know it was done, it seems more trouble than it would be worth.
Matthäus Klieber
97. Jäger-Division
71. Infanterie-Division
5. Gebirgsjäger-Division
T/5 Matthew Cleaver
165th Signal Photo Company
Gott Mit Uns
Hurra die Gams!
Image
Hoffman Grink

Re: Weapons "out of place"

Post by Hoffman Grink »

der Blutiger Eimer wrote:regarding comments about converting Ppsh's to German 9mm after the soviet ammo ran out,
how practical would that have been to do in the field (well, at least by the most forward armorer available)?
i'm not terribly familiar with what it would take, the precise differences in cartridges, nor am i a gunshith, but while i know it was done, it seems more trouble than it would be worth.
Reshouldering the chamber with a reaming tool and a small folded metal addition inside the magazines....... then a rebarrel. Not frontline work but doable.
What you all tend to do is think in your own terms - In an army, weapons aren't just allowed to "float about" - We know they do - even today "in theatre", buckshee guns are passed around units - but get caught and you are in deep shit. Don't think Hollywood.... Think about a disciplined army where rules are important and keep people alive.

Captured weapons - in the true sense of the word are weapons gathered up on a battlefield, returned to depots, sorted, examined and then returned to service. This means they go "on the books" and are part of the TOE for want of a better term.
Post Reply

Return to “Anything WWII!”